Institute Report
Developing Efficient Patient Referral Pathways for Radioligand Therapies
Healthcare professional insights from Germany, Italy, France, and China
Feb 04, 2025

Report Summary

Oncology care coordination is a complex process where patients must engage with various healthcare teams across specialties to treat their condition. The patient referral pathway is an important step within this process, requiring efficient and timely management. Many patients often face barriers in accessing necessary care during this process due to the numerous — and at times, unclear — steps involved, causing delays in treatment initiation. These issues are exacerbated for innovative therapies as they often require a new referral paradigm. As less established oncology treatments such as radioligand therapies enter already constrained healthcare systems, clear, efficient, and scalable patient referral pathways will be important in ensuring timely treatment for patients.

The objective of this report is to build upon prior research by the IQVIA Institute to understand the capacity and infrastructure readiness to administer radioligand therapies (RLT) in various geographies. This report focuses on the status of and barriers within the RLT patient referral journey — one of five capacity levers previously identified along with diagnostic capacity, number of RLT centres/beds, regulatory and patient release frameworks, and skilled workforce.

Key findings:

  • The RLT referral process for mCRPC patients in Germany, Italy, France, and China was evaluated through interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) with the aim of understanding the current referral pathway, associated barriers, and potential solutions.
    The RLT patient referral pathway typically involves seven key steps.
  • First, the physician confirms the patient’s progression to mCRPC and considers RLT as a possible treatment option. The patient is then referred to a centre capable of administering RLI and RLT. Tests such as PSMA PET-CT scans, blood work, and renal scintigraphy are conducted to establish RLT eligibility.
  • Once these tests are complete, a team of physicians, including oncologists and nuclear medicine physicians, evaluates the results and makes a treatment decision. If the patient is deemed eligible, RLT treatment is initiated, and the patient is closely monitored throughout the process.
  • Several common barriers to an efficient pathway were seen across all geographies. These include a lack of standardized referral pathways, a lack of clarity of roles and responsibilities for different stakeholder groups (e.g., urologists, oncologists, nuclear medicine physicians), and limited RLT infrastructure and/or capacity, particularly for PSMA PET-CT scans, which are used for eligibility testing.
  • Healthcare professionals in Germany, France, and China also reported limited involvement of referring healthcare professionals throughout the patient’s treatment journey as a challenge, as this may result in the lack of continuity for patient support by referring HCPs between and after treatment cycles with RLT administered by nuclear medicine physicians.
  • These variabilities in the patient referral pathway across the selected countries result in differing times from referral to treatment initiation. While this timeline can vary substantially within a country, generally healthcare professionals noted that a minimum of 7 weeks were required in Germany, while in France and China, this was closer to 8–9 weeks and around 11 weeks in Italy. While the assessed geographies differ significantly in patient population, healthcare infrastructure, and capacity to administer RLTs, treatment initiation timelines can range from 7–11 weeks depending on where patients are located.
  • Addressing the identified barriers is crucial for ensuring timely treatment administration. Adopting learnings and approaches regarding RLT referrals across countries and from other therapy areas can reduce treatment delays and potentially improve patient outcomes.
  • Based on the interviews and processes discussed with HCPs and an assessment of current barriers, several proposed approaches were highlighted with the overall goal of establishing clear and efficient RLT patient referral pathways.
  • While an ideal timeline for the RLT patient referral process has not been defined, the differences between countries and existing barriers highlight that there is room for improvement. These identified approaches can potentially reduce the time to treatment initiation by one to four weeks depending on the country and the hospital’s starting point.

Related solutions

Contact Us